|
NEW ITEMS:
Extended Relativity —Exploiting the Loopholes in Enstein's Relativity:—Abstract — Initial Review
Revised: Resolving a Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity —Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation (Supplementary Discussion)
The Story of Gravity and Lambda --How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery (Published in the March, 2010, issue of PHYSICS ESSAYS Journal (Vol.23 No.1))
Why Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity —“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his relativity theories.” ... A story of the perils of ignoring absolute motion!
(Published in the December, 2009, issue of
PHYSICS ESSAYS, a
Journal published through the American Institute of Physics.) |
|
GENERAL INTEREST ARTICLES: Mysteries & Paradoxes that Plague Standard Cosmology Cosmology Crisis of 1998 Conventional Cosmology Critique ... comments relating to the 'preposterous' expanding-universe paradigm. Models of the Universe: Historical, Expanding, and Cellular universes. DSSU, The Non-Expanding Universe: Structure, Redshift, Distance --- A long sought-after goal of astrophysicists has been a formulation of cosmic distance that is independent of the speed of light. The goal has now been achieved. The present Paper details the surprisingly simple distance expression and its validating agreement with Supernova data. Gravity and Lambda --a Story of Opposites ---A story of opposites in harmony. Key differences between the Conventional Cosmology and the New Cosmology are presented. Dynamic Cosmic Cell --The Structural Component of the DSSU ---Animated image and discussion of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system. Why Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity —“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his relativity theories.” ... A story of the perils of ignoring absolute motion! (Published in the December, 2009, issue of PHYSICS ESSAYS, a Journal published through the American Institute of Physics.) Questions & Answers |
| DSSU Theory: Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the DSSU (Introduction) --- This introductory essay gives a thematic tour of historical and modern universes culminating with the Natural Universe.
Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the Dynamic Steady State Universe
(PDF) ---The first complete presentation of all four
postulates of DSSU theory. A powerful paper that resolves the
cause-of-causes paradox, explains the non-independent nature of time, and
reveals the 'supreme advantage'. It includes a concise comparison with
standard cosmology focusing on real-world viability. Dynamic Cosmic Cell --The Structural Component of the DSSU ---Animated image and discussion of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.
Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Gravity Cells
Space Flow Equations and Expansion-Contraction Rates (PDF) ---This paper explores the mathematical aspects of the two space postulates of DSSU theory —and uncovers some profound consequences.
|
| ARTICLES on
AETHER: The Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology ---The aether has been detected at least 6 times in recent history. Its most recent re-discovery, in 2001, led to the long-sought causal mechanism of gravity ----a discovery, which in turn, is revolutionizing cosmology. Michelson-Morley and the Story of the Aether Theory Richard Milton's analysis of the historical details involving the misrepresentation, bias and cover-up that hampered the Aether theory. The History of
the Aether Theory ---The
historic development of the aether as a scientific theory of space itself.
What started as the "fifth element" of Antiquity becomes molded by
theoretical constraints and experimental evidence into the
dual-dynamic quantum foam
---the Essence of the Universe. DSSU Relativity --The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space ---Currently undergoing peer review. Here is an external webpage with an extensive list of research papers on the aether-drift experiments, and the larger question of energy in space. |
| DSSU RESEARCH PAPERS: DSSU Cosmic Redshift-Distance Relation (htm) (Converting the cosmic redshift into distance for our Cellular Universe using a simple and elegant equation) The Large Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe (PDF) (Chapter 1 of DSSU Manuscript) --- The postulates and implications of regional space expansion and contraction. Cosmic-Scale Structural Features Explained (PDF) (Chapter 2 of DSSU Manuscript) ---The Spacing of Clusters ---Sheets of Galaxies ---Supernodes ---Right-angled Walls of Galaxies.
The Cosmic Background Radiation in the
DSSU ---The natural explanation of the
microwave background radiation applicable to the natural Cellular Universe.
(PUBLICATION PENDING) |
|
Glossary of Terms
used in Cosmology and Astrophysics with particular emphasis on DSSU theory. Glossary in separate Window |
|
RELATIVITY ARTICLES: Extended Relativity —Exploiting the Loopholes in Enstein's Relativity:—Abstract — Initial Review Relativity of Time in the Aether-Space of the DSSU —Absolute Motion and Intrinsic Time Resolving a Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity —Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation (Revised PDF) DSSU
Absolute Space and the Lorentz Transformation (Publication pending) |
|
An Open Letter to the Scientific Community "The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory. ..." continues ... A devastating Declaration of opposition to Big Bang cosmology signed by more than 400 Researchers. For the full text click on: |
|
|
|
DEDICATION: This website is solemnly dedicated to those
individuals who have conducted research in their chosen field and have
informed others of their inquiries and suffered the consequences when
subpoenaed by the Inquisition or some variant thereof. The dedication
extends to those individuals currently imprisoned, and those now facing
trial and persecution simply for exercising their basic human right of
freedom of expression supposedly granted to them under the UN Charter of
Human Rights. . . . more than 1000 writers persecuted worldwide . . . |
|
D S S U Research
9th year on the Internet. 0301 |
The Cosmic Background Radiation in the DSSUPrologue
Before getting into the DSSU (Dynamic Steady State Universe) explanation of the Cosmic Background Radiation I will briefly discuss the officially sanctioned version. Probably the grandest scientific mythology of our time is the story of the expanding universe. The mythmakers who fabricated the story are admittedly uncertain regarding the event or events surrounding the very beginning —the beginning of the expanding universe. They all agree, however, that it all started with a once-in-a-universe-lifetime event —a spectacular display of plasmic fireworks. Now, some 15 to 20 gigayears later, the light has faded, the temperature has cooled, the colour has reddened; the cataclysmic flash of long long ago has transformed into the ubiquitous microwave background radiation. Notwithstanding the official consensus, notwithstanding the profuse claims, and notwithstanding the scholarly quality of the research literature, it is a scientific myth to say the universe expands.[2] It is a scientific myth to say it expanded from a hot plasmic ball. And it is scientific myth-making to interpret the microwave background radiation as the remnant radiation of the fire of a genesis scenario.
How, you may wonder, did mainstream astrophysics manage to come up with their fantastical misinterpretation? For the answer we have to go back to the first half of the twentieth century. During those years, astrophysicists, astronomers, and cosmologists gradually adopted a universe model in which the entire universe is expanding and is also bounded (that is, limited in extent). (Why they adopted the expanding-universe myth is another fascinating story which we don’t have time to cover here.) Given these two conditions, "expanding" and "finite," it was quickly recognized that if the model universe was allowed to run backwards in time it becomes evident that the universe originated from some compact and dense state. Georges Lemaître’s concept of the exploding ‘fireball’ universe was born and destined to become the ever popular Big Bang (BB) model. Following Lemaître’s early ‘success’, other cosmologists embraced the misconceived notion of an expanding universe and did their own extrapolation into the cosmic past. When they allowed the universe to run backwards in time they did not stop with the exploding ‘fireball’; they went even further and postulated the ultimate compact and dense state —a point of infinite density, a singularity. With this exciting new mystery, the Big Bang model became even more popular.
Popularity, however, does not guarantee validity. Critics of the model know that it contains a fatal flaw: something called the cosmogony paradox. Within BB cosmology there is no logical way to resolve the inherent contradiction of a universal genesis event. (See the brief description of the three parts of the cosmogony paradox in the adjacent textbox.) Nevertheless, this flawed cosmology is the one used to interpret astronomical observations ... with disastrous consequences. When extremely distant starlight was detected in 1963 & 1965 they said, no, that’s not the glow from ordinary stars, that’s the fossil flash of light from the birth of the universe. It must be the feeble remnant radiation of the spectacular display of Lemaitre’s ‘fireball’. And they called it Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR). What was it in their theory that prevented the recognition of ordinary starlight (of ultra high redshift)? ... Understand that the genesis, the fireball, and the whole-universe expansion thing, were all part of a mythical evolutionary process. Observations had to be interpreted accordingly. Stars, they said, could not have formed in the early BB fireball —their existence would spoil the evolutionary sequence. The model required that at some stage of the unfolding genesis the whole universe was like a single super-big star with a temperature of 3000 K. And so the afterglow of the creation of the universe became known as the source of the ubiquitous CMBR. In the unreal world of Academic Cosmology the CMBR serves as ‘evidence’ of the mythical creation and evolution of the universe. In the natural DSSU Cosmology the CMBR is simply a natural feature of the universe’s cellular structure.
The full story:
C. Ranzan (2009) | |||||||||
Notes and References
090116 | |||||||||
|
Top of page Back to DSSU Home Page |
|